LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #704, Saturday, (07/27/2024)
LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #704, Saturday, (07/27/2024)
“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”
A French CAESAR howitzer at work in Ukraine. Photo: Territorial Defense Media
LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Saturday, (07/27/2024)
The U.S. Senate and Congress should make this article a required reading for all Republican senators and congressmen so they will get the idea that freedom is not free, and in this case and many others, defending Ukraine is not charity. ~llaw
Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it’s self-preservation
Aid to Ukraine is paramount in all “manageable balance” scenarios of the Russian invasion, whether exhaustion of Russian troops or talks
27/07/2024
Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it’s self-preservation
Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
The ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war has shifted from consolidating Western unity to posing a potential threat of direct conflict with Moscow.
This evolution raises complex questions about Western involvement. Rather than asking, “How can we help Ukraine defeat a nuclear power without triggering a world war?” — a query that seems increasingly difficult to answer — we should reframe our approach. The more pertinent question is: “How can the West avoid losing to a nuclear power, and is Ukraine essential in this effort?”
To address this, we must consider various scenarios that fall short of global war. These can be broadly categorized into two approaches:
Passive strategies, while less costly in terms of resources, may lead to strategic defeat even if direct confrontation is avoided.
Active approaches, on the other hand, offer more preferable and sustainable long-term outcomes.
The critical factor distinguishing these strategies is the level of Western assistance to Ukraine.
Facts and context
The disparity in military spending between Ukraine and Russia has widened significantly in 2024. Ukraine’s budget stands at $40.7 billion, while Russia’s has surged to $115 billion. This gap has grown since 2022, when the figures were $44 billion and $86.3 billion, respectively.
Russia’s commitment to defense is even more striking in the long term. Reuters reports that Moscow plans to allocate $600 billion to defense and security from 2022 to 2025, suggesting further increases in military expenditure that will far outpace Ukraine’s capabilities.
Despite Kyiv’s apparent success in halting a new Russian offensive in the Kharkiv area, this situation poses significant challenges for Ukraine’s strained armed forces and struggling economy. The pledged minimum of $40 billion per annum in assistance from NATO countries is likely insufficient to tilt the balance in Ukraine’s favor or achieve clear political goals in the near future.
Potential outcomes: passive stance and strategic defeat
A scarcity of aid could significantly impact Russia’s perception of Western resolve. This might encourage the Kremlin to adopt more aggressive tactics, including attempts to seize additional territory and coercing Ukraine into concessions through persistent missile strikes
Such actions could lead to internal destabilization in Ukraine, undermining its role as an effective deterrent against Russian aggression. Consequently, closing the capability gap between Kyiv and Moscow would require a substantial increase in Western spending.
In that case, escalation management will be totally out of reach for the West — which is no less dangerous than escalation on the part of Ukraine (for instance, strikes on Russian oil refineries) as it will necessitate hastily organized talks on heavily unfavorable starting terms.
The West faces a dilemma in these potential negotiations:
Non-participation would force acquiescence to outcomes determined by others.
Direct participation would legitimize Russian gains, potentially eroding trust in Western-led security partnerships and the rules-based international order.
Attempts to later promote these principles by supporting what remains of Ukraine would likely prove ineffective. Even initiatives like Zelenskyy’s Peace Formula may be inadequate to address such a complex situation.
The consequences of Ukraine’s defeat could extend beyond the immediate conflict. China, with its significant influence over Russia and importance to the EU, could gain diplomatic leverage. This might pave the way for China’s increased security role in Eastern Europe, contrary to US interests.
Furthermore, if the Western stance lacks cohesion and the US shifts its focus elsewhere, the EU’s security and stability could be compromised. The EU is not equipped to be the primary security provider in such a scenario. History has shown that leaving Ukraine to be handled solely by Europeans, as attempted with the Minsk agreements in 2014, is not an effective strategy.
Active stance: an imperfect but manageable balance
The current scenario of gradual and prolonged exhaustion of Russian troops without settlement, while less sustainable than in previous years, remains viable with consistent Western support. This approach could lead to negotiations based on either Russia’s relative advantage or mutual exhaustion – both preferable to Ukraine’s outright defeat.
To secure favorable preconditions for potential talks, Ukraine requires constant and predictable aid. This support serves two crucial purposes:
It reduces Russia’s perceived benefits of continuing the conflict.
It prevents Moscow from imposing maximalist terms when Kyiv has no alternatives to negotiation.
Consequently, the transition to “peace” becomes more manageable.
If a settlement is reached through mutual exhaustion and relatively equal negotiations, its sustainability will hinge on an appropriate balance of forces. Achieving this balance requires Western assistance and should begin immediately.
Thus, military aid to Ukraine is not as an endless expense, but as both a precondition and foundation for an imperfect yet manageable future.
Beyond the Ukrainian context, broader considerations are crucial. Russian nuclear brinkmanship and threats to Central European states are likely to persist, regardless of Ukraine’s fate. This was evident in Moscow’s pre-invasion ultimatums to NATO. Therefore, sacrificing Ukraine would not necessarily prevent nuclear war threats.
The more significant concern, as Randall Schweller suggests, is the risk of underbalancing against Russia’s further belligerence in Europe.
While some may argue that the West has previously demonstrated its ability to curb Moscow’s ambitions, citing Cold War experiences, the current situation differs significantly. During the Cold War, American-Soviet relations in Europe resembled a balance between two status quo powers. In contrast, today’s Russia is clearly revisionist, willing to take greater risks and mount offensive actions.
The West, meanwhile, has not fully embraced a deterrence-by denial strategy despite advocating for it more strongly since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. NATO allies still require time and resources to build a force of 300,000 troops at high readiness for the eastern flank.
In the interim, Ukraine’s 1,000,000-strong army serves as a de facto response force, providing a buffer that spares the West from having to significantly increase its own deterrent capabilities, which might lack both capacity and credibility.
Aid to Ukraine necessary to avoid West’s strategic defeat
Aid to Ukraine is a crucial factor in all “manageable balance” scenarios of the Russian invasion, including:
Gradual and prolonged exhaustion of Russian troops without settlement
Negotiations based on relative Russian advantage
Talks resulting from mutual exhaustion
Maintenance of any post-war settlement that may be reached.
Continued assistance to Ukraine not only makes these scenarios viable but also helps the West avoid a strategic defeat and its consequent repercussions.
While the likelihood of a decisive victory in this war remains low, maintaining or enhancing Ukraine’s current position appears more favorable when considering the logic of transitivity of preferences. This approach provides the West with more significant influence over the conflict’s outcome without exposing it to additional risks.
Sacrificing Ukraine to avoid a nuclear war offers questionable benefits: Russian nuclear threats will likely persist even if the “Ukraine question” is resolved in Moscow’s favor.
Regarding conventional capabilities, Russia may require substantial time to recover from its losses. While this prospect may seem reassuring for the West, recent events suggest caution. Russia’s retreat from several Ukrainian regions in 2022 and the subsequent course of the war indicate that Russia’s recovery period might be shorter than anticipated, potentially posing additional threats to European security.
Ukraine has become an integral part of the Western-led security architecture in Europe. This framework has the potential to return to a manageable state of normalcy or even improve compared to the pre-2022 situation. Alternative scenarios risk dangerous global shifts that could jeopardize our collective security and are, therefore, best avoided.
This text is part of the project “Pragmatic Dialogue with the West: Why It Is Worth Supporting Ukraine,” undertaken with the support of the International Renaissance Foundation. It presents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the position of the International Renaissance Foundation.
Silvester Nosenko
Silvester Nosenko, Senior Lecturer at the Department of International Relations, Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Translator to the President of Ukraine (2020-2022)
ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:
There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:
All Things Nuclear
Nuclear Power
Nuclear Power Emergencies
Nuclear War
Nuclear War Threats
Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are three Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)
Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.
A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.
TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Saturday, (07/27/2024)
All Things Nuclear
NEWS
Biden to nominate nuclear engineer, Senate staffer, to fill last NRC vacancy
ExchangeMonitor
... things to prepare the NRC for a surge in new nuclear reactor models. ... All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Diversity ...
Is there a sunken nuclear bomb near Florida? Here's what to know - ClickOrlando.com
ClickOrlando.com
... nuclear bomb in tow, heading out to meet ... Copyright 2024 by WKMG ClickOrlando - All rights reserved. About the Author. Anthony Talcott headshot ...
Rare astronomical event expected to occur soon - WUNC
WUNC
So a nova is when you have a pair of stars orbiting each other, and about half of all stars, unlike our Sun, are found to be orbiting a companion star ...
Nuclear Power
NEWS
IEA Scenarios and the Outlook for Nuclear Power
World Nuclear Association
The energy projections produced by the International Energy Agency (IEA) are frequently consulted by policymakers, the media, and analysts.
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation's heartland - Straight Arrow News
Straight Arrow News
A nuclear power comeback is starting to take shape in the U.S. as officials consider reopening the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa.
Second-to-last nuclear reactor shut down - Taipei Times
Taipei Times
Second-to-last nuclear reactor shut down. GAS BOOST: An LNG unit would buttress the shortfall from the closure, and could generate more power than Ma- ...
Nuclear Power Emergencies
NEWS
Officials investigate blaze at nuclear power plant | News | baycitytribune.com
The Bay City Tribune
Officials investigate blaze at nuclear power plant. By ... “An Unusual Event is the lowest of four nuclear emergency classifications,” she said.
25 states file emergency appeal to pause new EPA regulations - NewsNation
NewsNation
... plant for a next-generation nuclear power plant he believes will “revolutionize” how power is generated. (AP Photo/Natalie Behring, File). Get fact ...
Nuclear War
NEWS
The unacceptable, growing risk of nuclear war - The Boston Globe
The Boston Globe
The unacceptable, growing risk of nuclear war. Leaders of nuclear-armed nations seem unaware of the dangers of their combative talk. But the heads of ...
Russian Nuclear-Capable Missile Destroys Zelensky's 'Secret' Depot | Putin | Ukraine War
YouTube
On Camera: Russian Nuclear-Capable Missile Destroys Zelensky's 'Secret' Depot | Putin | Ukraine War. 22K views · 3 hours ago #ukrainesecretweapon ...
Russia's Lavrov says US-South Korea nuclear guideline adds concern, media reports | Reuters
Reuters
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday a recently announced guideline on the operation of U.S. nuclear assets on the Korean ...
Nuclear War Threats
NEWS
Chilling US map shows areas most likely to be targeted in a nuclear war - is your state on it?
MSN
The threat of nuclear war looms over parts of America as Russia's invasion of Ukraine and other global conflicts persist.
Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it's self-preservation - Euromaidan Press
Euromaidan Press
... risks. Sacrificing Ukraine to avoid a nuclear war offers questionable benefits: Russian nuclear threats will likely persist even if the “Ukraine ...
Inside the secret Cold War bunker left abandoned in major UK city with miles of concrete ...
The US Sun
BENNY & THE THREATS. Donald Trump warns Netanyahu of 'World War 3 if he ... Completed in 1966, the bunker would have provided refuge for local officials ..
Yellowstone Caldera
NEWS
Yellowstone closes Biscuit Basin for the season following hydrothermal blast | Local News
Wyoming Tribune Eagle
Geology · Earth Sciences · Volcanology · Geological Processes · Water · Volcanism · Diamond · Yellowstone Caldera · Volcano · Volcanic Hazards ...
If Yellowstone's volcanic system erupted, how could it impact the US? - Fox 59
Fox 59
The past 60-80 eruptions would have had little regional (or continental) impact,” they explained. The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory said Yellowstone ...
Here's how a 'volcanic supereruption' at Yellowstone might impact life in Colorado
Denver Gazette
... Yellowstone Supereruption,' published by Yellowstone Volcano Observatory – one showing distribution of ash in each major eruption and another ...